A group of likeminded lawmakers in the House of Representatives has called for a return to the parliamentary system of government in Nigeria and lamented that the presidential. System has grounded development of the country.
The group which addressed a press conference on the issue at the House Press Corps said that the group of 60 legislators stand on the crisp of history, as lawmakers across party affiliations and regional backgrounds that came together to present bills proposing constitutional alterations that seek a transition to parliamentary system of government.
The Spokesman of the group Hon Abdulssamad Dasuki said that the bills, seeking to alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999, advocate a transition from the current presidential system to a parliamentary system at all levels – federal, state, and local government.
The proposed alterations, when passed, would significantly impact the national political landscape.
The argued that our founders in their wisdom and in a political atmosphere devoid of compulsion, and having considered the interests of their native peoples and their desire to live together in a country where truth and justice reign, where no man is oppressed, and where all citizens live in peace and plenty, adopted the parliamentary system of government.
They further said that the governance system of the First Republic, a period when legislative and executive powers were exercised by the representatives of the people in parliament and in the executive, and by the nature of the system these representatives were accountable to the people.
He said: “For six years while it was in operation, the system worked for the country. The collapse of the First Republic and the long stretch of military rule culminated in the adoption of a new system of government, theoretically fashioned after the Presidential System of the United States but in practice imbibed the uttermost attributes of military rule.
“No wonder the Nigerian President appears to be one of the most powerful Presidents in the world. Over the years, the imperfections of the Presidential System of Government have become glaring to all, despite several alterations to the constitution to address the shortcomings of a system that has denied the nation the opportunity of attaining its full potentials.
“Among these imperfections are the high cost of governance, leaving fewer resources for crucial areas like infrastructure, education, and healthcare, and consequently hindering the nation’s development progress, and the excessive powers vested in the members of executive, who are appointees and not directly accountable to the people”.
The lawmakers said that the bills presented today before the House seek a return to the system of government adopted by our founders, which made governance accountable, responsible and responsive, and ultimately less expensive.
According to the group, with the presentation of these bills they hope to achieve the following:
Ignite, provoke a national conversation about the future of Nigerian governance system.
To ensure robust public debates, stakeholder consultations, expert analyses, and a thorough and informed decision-making process.
To raise awareness about this significant development and encourage constructive dialogue on the potential implications of these proposed constitutional alterations.
They pointed out that the future of Nigerian governance rests on informed public engagement, and responsive and responsible leadership.
The fundamental changes outlined in the bills include: Parliamentary System: Replacing the President with a Prime Minister to serve as the Head of Government and establishing the office of the President as a ceremonial leader.
These elective offices are to be chosen from the elected members of the legislature.
Furthermore, on legislative elections, it proposes shifting the process of electing governors and chairmen of local governments from general election to voting within their respective legislative bodies.
They also canvassed that there should be streamlined administration by potentially reducing bureaucratic hurdles and fostering closer collaboration between the executive and legislative branches.
The group said that its conviction is that a streamlined executive branch, which replaces the President and Vice President with a Prime Minister and Cabinet chosen from the legislature could lead to a smaller central government, reducing salaries and administrative expenses.
They also hold strongly that shifting the election of governors and local government chairmen from general election to votes within their respective legislative bodies could save billions spent on state and nationwide campaigns
The conviction they revealed is because ministers, commissioners (at the state level) and supervisors (at the local government level) emerge from parliament, there is a greater coordination between the executive and the legislature, just as there will be increased legislative scrutiny, which would make cabinet members responsive to the yearnings of the people and more accountable.
The proponents of these alterations strongly argued that constitution for a parliamentary system of government have placed the interest of any nation above all other interests.
The parliamentary group averred that the national conversation that would be ignited by these bills would lead to a system of government that works for our dear nation.
